What best describes the relationship between economic useful life and lease terms?

The relationship between economic useful life and lease terms is best captured by the notion that the lease term can equal or exceed the useful life of the asset being leased. This is significant because it reflects the principle that a lessee should have access to and enjoy the use of the asset for at least as long as it retains its utility and economic value.

When the lease term is equal to or longer than the useful life, it provides the lessee the opportunity to fully utilize the asset within its productive timeframe. This arrangement is beneficial for both parties; the lessor can recoup their investment while the lessee can benefit from the use of the asset without needing to purchase it outright. This concept is foundational in lease agreements to ensure that the terms reflect the economic realities of asset utilization.

In contrast, a shorter lease term may not allow the lessee to take full advantage of the asset's economic potential, potentially making it less appealing. The other options suggest either a disconnect between lease duration and useful life or propose incorrect relationships that don't accurately reflect standard leasing practices. Understanding this connection is critical for those involved in leasing transactions as it impacts valuation, pricing, and the overall structure of lease agreements.